|
|
 |
MARINE NATURAL PRODUCTS AS ANTIMICROBIALS
You're Surrounded
We're never alone.
Though they remain unnoticed and largely ignored until we succumb to infection, or some leftovers in the
fridge "go bad," bacteria and other microbial life constantly surround us. They are present in the air we breathe and in
the water we swim in at the beach. On every surface we come in contact with they also form invisible biofilms that can cause
a wide range of problems from bacterial conditions such as lyme disease and surgery-related infections to gum disease. Surprisingly,
the answers to preventing or curing such problems may reside in natural products discovered in an Australian seaweed.
Bacterial biofilms are groups of bacterial cells and the extracellular material they produce that assemble on surfaces. On
land, biofilms are of great concern to health professionals because it turns out bacteria are most likely to make people
sick when they occur in this form. In the marine environment, where they form on everything from fish to rocks, biofilms
are of particular interest to research scientists because their behavior is very different in that form compared to how they
behave in a planktonic (free living) state.
In the ocean, the same bacterial species are found both as free-floating individuals and in biofilms. Until recently,
marine microbiologists considered biofilms to simply be random agglomerations of whatever overlying planktonic bacteria have
settled there. Over the past decade, however, a new picture has emerged in which bacteria are believed to communicate with
each other to coordinate a number of activities, including the so-called "swarming" events that lead to biofilm formation.
This apparent communication has been termed quorum sensing.
Bacteria Talk
Borrowing a term from the business world, a quorum is the threshold number of people required to do official business. In
similar fashion, an uncoordinated free-living bacterial population appears to wait to chemically sense the presence of a
critical number of individuals before a coordinated swarming event begins. When there is enough chemical signal
concentrated, it triggers the swarming response that creates biofilms.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that two-thirds of all human
bacterial infections are caused by biofilms. This is mainly because the abundant sugars and starches (polysaccharides) that
form the matrix holding biofilms together create a "bulletproof" barrier that protects biofilms against antibiotics as well
as human defenses such as antibodies and white blood cells. In fact, killing biofilms can take antibiotic doses 1,000 times
higher than that required to get free-living bacteria under control.
Can You Hear Me Now?
Because biofilms can do so much damage and are so hard to kill, it would seem logical that being able to prevent biofilms
from forming would be a valuable trick. As it turns out, researchers are pursuing this very tactic as a way of controlling
biofilms by focusing on the chemical signals that trigger their formation.
Scientists have already discovered several examples in nature where biofilm production is suppressed. One type of seaweed—a
marine red alga called Delisea pulchra—that grows in Australia's famous Botany Bay is almost completely resistant to the
surface fouling of biofilms, even those that cover nearly ever other exposed surface in marine systems.
Australian scientists Staffan Kjelleberg and Peter Steinberg of the University of New South Wales' Centre for Marine Biofouling and Bio-Innovation (CMBB) have
discovered that the explanation for this strange phenomenon is that the seaweed produces a novel class of chemical compounds called
furanones. Over 40 of them have thus far been isolated. These natural products have a
structure that is similar to the chemical signals used by bacteria to trigger quorum sensing. Chemical signals often work
like a lock and key, fitting into specific locations on an organism's surface to trigger certain responses. So far, based on
experimental evidence, it looks like the furanones fit into the "keyholes" needed for quorum sensing, thus blocking the
biofilm formation response. In a sense, the bacteria become "deafened" to the
chemical call for biofilm formation so they remain free-living and therefore much more vulnerable to antibiotic attack. Further
research has shown that the furanones may also block bacteria from producing some of the products that cause illness.
These findings suggest the exciting possibility that furanones or similar signal blockers could soon be used to block
biofilm formation, rendering previously resistant bacterial infections vulnerable to antibiotic treatment. An added benefit of such
treatments is that, because they do not actually kill free-living forms, their use would theoretically not lead to resistant
bacterial strains. By contrast, resistance is a major problem with antibiotic use because antibiotics kill only a portion of
the bacteria present, leaving those not susceptible to the treatment to grow and divide into a population of bacteria
resistant to that antibiotic.
However, significant challenges remain, not least of which is overcoming the fact that illness-causing biofilms are produced
by many different bacterial species that all have their own communication systems. Each of these systems can have its own
chemical signals that must be blocked separately, and individual furanones tend to be effective at blocking only one system.
Possible solutions include isolating or synthesizing a larger range of furanones to be used in treatments, or discovering other related
chemicals that have wider effects.
Also of concern, some research has suggested that furanones may be too toxic for long-term treatment of human illness.
However, CMBB has already generated more than 150 synthetic chemical compounds based on the structures of natural furanones isolated from
D. pulchra. Among such analogues, biochemists will likely be able to find compounds that are not as toxic to humans as the
natural furanones.
Another problem is that the furanones that have shown promise in blocking biofilm formation are not very effective at
disrupting already established films. However, a separate chemical signaling system that triggers biofilm detachment for one
species of bacteria has already been discovered, and researchers expect that they will be able to isolate furanones or other
chemical compounds that can act as a substitute for these signals to trigger detachment. If the bulletproof bioflms could be disrupted in this manner,
traditional antibiotics or even a patient's own immune system could deal with the bacterial infection.
Some potential biomedical applications for biofilm blocking as these challenges are overcome are described below. Equally
intriguing potential environmental applications in the field of biomaterials engineering, particularly with regard to combatting biofouling, are
explored elsewhere within the website.
Potential Biomedical Applications
Effective treatments for disrupting formation of biofilms or allowing elimination of established biofilms could be useful
against a host of bacterial diseases including a range of skin disorders, lyme disease, cholera, various infections related
to surgical procedures and countless others.
There is also great interest in using furanones or similar compounds to fight serious human diseases such as cystic
fibrosis, which involves the clogging of lungs with mucus-rich biofilms produced by the normally benign bacterium
Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The disease is fatal and generally claims the lives of victims at early ages. P. aeruginosa happens
to be a species that has already proven susceptible to chemical signaling disruption by furanones, and research into the
effectiveness of furanones in a mouse model of cystic fibrosis has already yielded promising results.
Gum disease is a common human illness related to bacterial biofilm formation. The condition results when a harmful
bacterial species called Fusobacterium takes hold within the otherwise benign plaque biofilms in our mouths. If a signal
blocker effective against Fusobacterium were discovered gum disease could be prevented.
Contact lenses and implanted or inserted medical devices, such as artificial heart valves and urinary catheters, are
unfortunate sources of biofilm contamination and a significant source of infection. Surface-contamination of such devices
is the leading source of nosocomial (originating in hospitals) illness. Work is in progress to examine the possibility of
fabricating antibacterial materials or coatings for such devices that incorporate furanone molecules into their structures.
Treatments similar to those developed for bacterial diseases could also be used to treat existing biofilms on mechanical
heart valves and other implanted devices made from traditional materials.
And in fact, furanone discoverers Kjelleberg and Steinberg are part of a commercial venture, Biosignal Limited, whose mission centers on developing biotch applications of furanone-based technology.
Biomedical product applications under development include the production of antibacterial contact lenses, and furanone-impregnated implants and
catheters. Environmental applications include the develpment of marine antifouling paints and furanone-incorporated industrial products.
Other MBT-based research efforts aimed at developing safer medical implants are examined in this website's spotlight section on biomimetics
spotlight section on biomimetics
References
Costerton, JW. Antifouling. Pp 8-13 in: Opportunities For Environmental Applications of Marine biotechnology, Proceedings
of the Oct 5-6, 1999 Workshop. 2000 National Academy Press.
Davies, DG., Parsek MP, Pearson JP, Iglewski BH, Costerton JW, and EP Greenburg. 1998. The involvement of cell-to-cell
signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm. Science 280:295-298.
Fuqua, C, Winans S, and E. Greenburg. 1996. Census and consensus in bacterial ecosystems: the LuxR-LuxI family of
quorum-sensing transcriptural regulators. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 50:727-751.
Hentzer, M., Riedel, K., Rasmussen, T.B., Heydorn, A., Andersen, J.B., Parsek, M.R., Rice, S.A., Eberl, L., Molin, S,
Hčiby, N., Kjelleberg, S., Givskov, M. 2002. Inhibition of quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm bacteria by a
halogenated furanone compound Microbiology 148:87-102.
Kjelleberg, S., and P. Steinberg. 2001. Surface warfare in the sea. Microbiology Today 28:134-135.
Mittleman, MW. bacterial biofilms and biofouling: Translational research in marine biotechnology. Pp 3-7 in:
Opportunities For Environmental Applications of Marine biotechnology, Proceedings of the Oct 5-6, 1999 Workshop. 2000
National Academy Press.
Related Weblinks
Center for Biofilm Engineering (CBE) homepage
http://www.erc.montana.edu
Fighting Bacteria With Inside Information (Genome News Network June 7, 2002 feature article)
http://www.genomenewsnetwork.org/articles/06_02/biofilms.shtml
Catalyst - Wonder Weed (2002 ABC Australia TV SCience news story)
http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s586947.htm
|
 |